Below are my discussion forum posts for this week:
These
are my takeaways from the readings on strategies for teaching reading online:
From the article Reading on the Internet: The
Link Between Literacy and Technology -
It is interesting that “most of the text on the Internet is expository. Being
able to read such text requires familiarity with its concepts, vocabulary, and
organizational format…. Because of technology, our definition of reading has
changed to include websites, e-books, e-mail, discussion boards, chat rooms,
instant messaging, and listservs.” My comment: However,
unfortunately, in many adult education ESL programs, the texts and writing
assignments are more of a personal narrative nature. Implementing the CCRS for
reading will be a first step toward ensuring that the reading and writing we
have our students do is more related to real-life reading and writing
tasks. This is something I need to work on, as I mentioned in another
post.
“Strategic readers of print
text… tend to use a set of comprehension strategies (Dole, Duffy, Roehler, &
Pearson, 1991; Pearson, 1985)….Paris, Cross, and Lipson (1984) concluded that students can be taught
about the existence of reading strategies through informed direct instruction. Duke and Pearson (2002) suggested that a model of
comprehension instruction should include explicit description, modeling,
collaborative use, guided practice, and independent use of the selected
strategy.”
My
comment: Because
I realize many of my students’ need for this explicit instruction on reading
strategies and modeling of it, that’s the reason I have most reading tasks
completed in class, not online.
Figure 1 and 2 in the article were very helpful; however, the
examples of online reading strategies in practice did not include any of the
explicit teaching/modeling. In each case, independent readers were applying the
strategies without instructor presence. I was still confused about how to
explicitly teach reading strategies online, until reading about the phases of
Internet Reciprocal Teaching. However, from my understanding, this explicit
teaching of reading strategies (Teacher-led instruction phase) for online
reading involves face-to-face instruction. I don’t know how this would be
conducted in a fully-online course. Screencasts? Anyway, when I reflect on my
practice, I realize that I do phase 2 and 3 most of the time.
I also read Scaffolding ESL Students'
Reading Comprehension:
I completely agree with the suggestions / value of the techniques
of building/activating schema, using visuals and realia to pre-teach
vocabulary, and provide written prompts for discussions based on readings.
However, I disagree with this suggestion and would never do it
myself: “One
way to scaffold for ESL students who can read in their native language is to provide
access to the text in their own language prior to reading in English.
Pre-reading in the native language will help ESL students to build the schema
that will allow them to better understand the English text.” My comment: In my opinion, there are
two problems with this technique for scaffolding reading: 1) if students need
to read the text in their native languages, the text is too difficult for
students’ current level of reading ability in English, and 2) it is a lazy way
to teaching (my personal opinion – no offense intended!). The only time I can
imagine using this technique is in an EFL situation in which all students share
the same L1, and the purpose of the course is just to pass some English test
(like in a lot of countries where English is just a book language, not taught
for real communication) in order to move on to the next level of education.
Finally, in the article Using Technology to Assist in
Vocabulary Acquisition and Reading Comprehension –
It was interesting that “…results in
retention are triggered by picture + text annotations, whereas pronunciation,
video, and audio glosses seem to correlate negatively with reading
comprehension…” My comment: Lesson
– steer clear of online reading tasks that have too much media; they may
overwhelm students.
“…good CALL programs should
make best use of visual elements and multimedia glossing, as well as generate
students' participation. The programs should be interactive, allowing the
students to make choices. Also, they should consist of a wide range of
different types of exercises in which students not only choose the right
answers but also type in answers.”
My
comment: This is good to know,
especially about including a range of question types and student responses to
go beyond guessing and into deeper critical thinking, which cannot be judged by
multiple-choice questions.
Online Tools for Vocabulary
I read the article eVoc Strategies: 10 Ways to Use Technology to
Build Vocabulary. The information was not that new but good reminders. Here the
takeaways for me from the article:
Teaching words, morphology, and word origins is an important
component in any vocabulary learning program. It is also necessary to provide
multiple exposures to the word in different contexts and to teach word learning
strategies, such as using context clues, cognate information, and deciding when
a word is important to know and remember.
My comment: From my experience, students can be fooled by false cognates, so
while cognates really help some students (speakers of Romance languages
mostly), I more often point out false cognates (attend v. assist, molest v.
bother, wrist v. doll – many funny stories over the years due to these types of
words…)
Direct vocabulary instruction is essential, but research indicates
that students with well-developed vocabularies learn many more words indirectly
through reading than from instruction.
My comment: This
is an interesting point. Perhaps we do too much pre-teaching of vocabulary at
the higher levels of ESL. I have noticed that a lot of ESL textbooks are
designed to really go in-depth with the vocabulary before the reading. I
usually reverse the order by having students just read first to get the main
idea of the article and then do the vocabulary afterwards unless there is/are
(a) word(s) that I know for sure that students do not know and is essential to
understanding the text. However, even then, I model with a real-aloud and stop
at those words – usually some student can give an intelligent guess at what the
word means, which is what we usually do in real-life reading tasks, anyway,
right?
The tools I use most often for
teaching vocabulary are the following:
Images and personal or student anecdotes / stories on PowerPoint
slides.
I really like Visuwords and Snappywords (basically the same) for
students to see semantic relationships between words. Also, Instagrok (has an app) is awesome
because it’s like these two sites, except it includes Web content, images, and
video content. Check it out!
SpellingCity (with an
app) – I use this site more often when I teach intermediate, not advanced
classes. I think everyone knows this one by now. It creates audio dictation
sentences for word lists you enter.
Quizlet (with an app)
– also probably familiar to everyone. It creates audio flashcards, games, and
quizzes from vocabulary words that are entered. You can select user-submitted
definitions, enter your own definitions, or even enter cloze sentences for
matching.
PowerPoint games (Jeopardy, etc.) for review of vocabulary
My college provides all students with a free screen reading
software (Read Write and Gold), which also has glossing capabilities. I haven’t
had students use it in a while, though.
I have never used concordances or corpora, but I like the ideas in
the book New Ways in
Teaching Vocabulary (TESOL Press), such as having students find
collocations or use corpora.
Finally, I like to teach idioms related to themes / reading
topics. I use anecdotes and images on PowerPoint slides. Then, at the end of
the term, students work together to write dialogs using some of their favorite
idioms from the term. They digitize their dialogs on Dvolver (animation
site) or MakeBeliefsComix or StoryboardThat (comic strip sites) or make
student-produced videos. They love it! I have also used this approach with
phrasal verbs.
My students most often use dictionary / translator apps they have
on their smart phones to learn vocabulary independently, but for those who
request extra vocabulary learning opportunities, I refer them to A.Word.A.Day email / listserv, which
sends a vocabulary word a day (never used it myself, but it looks cool).
Learning
Chocolate is great for beginning ESL (which I haven’t taught in
years);Games to Learn English looks
fun.
A great way to assess vocabulary is with cloze exercises, as we
all know. Two sites that I have used and that make this easier to do are LearnClick (better) and Cloze Test Creator (OK).
A site that was recommended to me last year but that I have yet to
try is VocabKitchen. Has anyone
heard of it? It looks amazing, according to the descriptions: It has a
social reader. The vocabkitchen.com social reader lets you
share text with a class and watch how they interact with it in real time. You
can see which students are reading a text and which words they are selecting,
all updated instantly and without the hassle of creating student accounts. It also has a Vocabulary Profiler: A
vocabulary profiler is a tool that checks if a piece of text contains words
from a vocabulary list. The vocabkitchen.com profiler shows matches in two
ways. Matched words in the original text are given a different color, or you
can view a list of all the words in a table organized by level. You don’t need
an account to use our profilers.
I have been looking a lot at apps, because more than 90% of my
students have smart phones. A Web-based tool and app that I think is awesome
for vocabulary is Memrise. Teachers can create their
own courses, and students can add their own “mems” – mnemonic images to help
them visualize and remember vocabulary. The way the site/app is set up follows
brain research on learning and memory: that repetition and quizzing at
strategic spaced intervals increases the chances that something newly-learned
will be retained in memory. Also, I really like the app Illustrate (also
on Google Play for Android). It’s a video dictionary that teaches vocabulary
through animated stories. There are not activities, however, but it would
interesting to explore how it could be used for pre-reading vocabulary
preparation.
The tools I use most often for
teaching reading are the following:
Video with conversation
questions, listening/viewing guide questions, and discussion questions as
pre-reading activities to introduce the topic and some vocabulary – I usually
find videos on YouTube. When I can’t find a good video, I find an online
slideshow or create my introductory PowerPoint slideshow.
When using online reading
materials, I most often find newsworthy or high-interest reading passages on
the Web (in general, not from ESL-specific sites) to use or modify for use in
my classes. Whenever I see something online that may be used for my classes, I
bookmark it (“curate”).
I look to the ReadWriteThink site for a lot of vocabulary and
reading activities and ideas.
As
for ESL/ABE/Literacy-specific sites that I like to use, my department
subscribes to The Change Agent, which has some
accompanying Web activities. Some of my colleagues like to use the Marshall Adult School’s Reading
Skills for Today’s Adults site, which has great activities,
but to be honest the life-skills reading topics are a bit boring for me.
I
can’t wait to use Newsela and News in Levels, both of which have
current news pieces that are accessible to ESL students, more often.
I
have created a few lessons based on essays from NPR’s This I Believe,
which has audio for some essays and transcripts, so that listening can be
integrated, as well.
Finally, Awesome Stories is a great site for nonfiction and
biographical reading materials, too.
My instructor's feedback to me on this week:
My instructor's feedback to me on this week:
Week 2 Checklist
X Discuss:
Strategies for Reading and Vocabulary
X Discover:
Online Tools for Reading and Vocabulary
X Brainstorm
Word Clouds
X Reflection
X Wiki:
Lesson Plan Activity for Vocabulary
X Wiki:
Lesson Plan Activity for Reading
X Wiki:
Online Tools for Vocabulary and Reading
Comments:
Thank you for your contributions
in Week 2. You have completed all
Assignments and I thank you for your extensive comments and input. As always, you bring so much new and valuable
information to the course and many helpful resources and strategies to share
with others.
Your wiki site has some excellent
vocabulary and reading resources, including Lingro, Newsela and Rewordify. You can keep adding as you find other
technology tools for these skill areas.
Many times the best resources are found when we are informally
searching.
Your lesson plan topic,
Symbolism, provides an engaging topic that incorporates many useful online
resources and instructional strategies.
I especially like your Symbolism handout and the prediction activity.
Task 5, Create a personal seal, is an excellent way to personalize
learning. I look forward to the further
development of your lesson plan.
Thank you for your continued
participation in the course.
Best,
Sandy
No comments:
Post a Comment